Sunday, June 9, 2013
On the energy-delay trade-off in geographic forwarding in always-on wireless sensor networks: A multi-objective optimization problem
The design and development of multi-hop wireless sensor networks are
guided by the specific requirements of their corresponding sensing
applications. These requirements can be associated with certain
well-defined qualitative and/or quantitative performance metrics, which
are application-dependent. The main function of this type of network is
to monitor a field of interest using the sensing capability of the
sensors, collect the corresponding sensed data, and forward it to a data
gathering point, also known as sink. Thus, the longevity of
wireless sensor networks requires that the load of data forwarding be
balanced among all the sensor nodes so they deplete their battery power
(or energy) slowly and uniformly. However, some sensing
applications are time-critical in nature. Hence, they should satisfy
strict delay constraints so the sink can receive the sensed data
originated from the sensors within a specified time bound. Thus, to
account for all of these various sensing applications, appropriate data
forwarding protocols should be designed to achieve some or all of the
following three major goals, namely minimum energy consumption, uniform
battery power depletion, and minimum delay. To this end, it is necessary
to jointly consider these three goals by formulating a multi-objective
optimization problem and solving it. In this paper, we propose a data
forwarding protocol that trades off these three goals via slicing the
communication range of the sensors into concentric circular bands. In particular, we discuss an approach, called weighted scale-uniform-unit sum,
which is used by the source sensors to solve this multi-objective
optimization problem. Our proposed data forwarding protocol, called Trade-off Energy with Delay
(TED), makes use of our solution to this multi-objective optimization
problem in order to find a “best” trade-off of minimum energy
consumption, uniform battery power depletion, and minimum delay. Then,
we present and discuss several numerical results to show the
effectiveness of TED. Moreover, we show how to relax several widely used
assumptions in order to enhance the practicality of our TED protocol,
and extend it to real-world network scenarios. Finally, we evaluate the
performance of TED through extensive simulations. We find that TED is near optimal with respect to the energy × delay
metric. This simulation study is an essential step to gain more insight
into TED before implementing it using a sensor test-bed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment